Hezbollah deals a severe blow to Israeli intelligence

The problem is not that the enemy’s prime minister fell victim to his traditional showmanship, but rather lies in a professional mistake of strategic dimensions committed by one or both sides: Either Netanyahu himself needed information, even false, to incite Hezbollah in his speech at the United Nations, or the intelligence apparatus. The one who committed a serious professional mistake when he submitted to Netanyahu what was supposed to be a “final piece of information” regarding a facility that Netanyahu said, proudly, that it had been seized. One of the reasons for the apparatus’s occurrence in this error may be the political leadership’s insistence on the necessity of providing information with specific characteristics that serve a decreed goal in the context of the incitement policy.

In a few hours, “Israel” received a media blow no less than that which accompanied the bombing of the battleship “Sa’ar” at sea during the July 2006 war, when the Secretary-General of Hezbollah uttered his famous phrase “Look at it burning.”

It was dropped in the hands of everyone, especially the media that are allied with “Israel” in Lebanon and abroad, which did not find a time to play with what Netanyahu said.

Hezbollah dealt a loud political, propaganda and intelligence blow to the enemy’s entity, with its political and intelligence apparatus. In more direct terms, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, in a live broadcast on the air, directed a resounding slap to the enemy’s prime minister, which will leave its echo, and perhaps its repercussions, inside the Israeli intelligence establishment, and will contribute to undermining the credibility of the top of the pyramid in Tel Aviv, and will lead to a litany of responsibilities About failure at a sensitive time internally, as well as in the context of the conflict with Hezbollah. Of course, the repercussions of the slap inside the intelligence establishment may not go out into the open, but it will represent a station to draw lessons and try to answer specific questions: Where did the intelligence make mistakes, where did Netanyahu make a mistake, and how can you confuse false information in subsequent stations?

The successful step taken by Hezbollah in undermining Netanyahu’s plan to exploit the UN platform represented a blow with intelligence and political dimensions, and the propaganda strategy pursued by “Israel” against the party. What exacerbates these dimensions is that the tools for their implementation were neither soldiers in the army, nor a minister, nor an administrative official, nor a distinguished expert, but rather the state as its entity, through the top of its hierarchy, from the highest international forum, and in a very sensitive issue.

Before the explosion of the port on August 4, “Israel” was pursuing a policy of inciting the environment that incubated the resistance and the entire Lebanese people against it and its weapons. “Israel” saw in the incident an ideal opportunity that could represent a solid ground and a driving force for the incitement plan against the resistance to new heights.

It adopted a propaganda policy based on exploiting the Lebanese’s fears of a recurrence of the disaster, and Netanyahu did not conceal his goal of this incitement. Rather, during his speech before the United Nations, he directed directly to the residents of the Jnah area in the southern suburbs and to the rest of the Lebanese to rise up against Hezbollah, because «if it explodes This store will fall into another tragedy. And the Lebanese citizens … you should ask them to dismantle these warehouses. ”

On the other hand, Hezbollah took a complex and two-way step, aimed at exposing Netanyahu’s lies and blocking the way for him and his intelligence to benefit from it later. Sayyed Nasrallah announced that the media are invited immediately to visit the place that Netanyahu has identified to cut off any subsequent allegations of emptying the facility, and in parallel he was keen to cut off the road to Israeli intelligence (specifically) by confirming that this step “does not bind us to the principle that whenever Netanyahu talks about a place we should Calling the media to him ». The importance of this restriction on this station is very essential, as it aims to prevent “Israel” from turning every claim that a place contains missile stores into an opportunity to expose the resistance and Lebanon for security.

At the messaging level:
Hizbullah achieved a qualitative achievement in the battle of awareness and public opinion. It is one of the most important arenas and axes of the ongoing conflict in Lebanon. As internal and external parties try to distort the image of the resistance and its weapons, which undermined Netanyahu’s credibility in the context of the battle for consciousness, as he was betting that this station would represent a qualitative asset upon which to base his subsequent steps. It is one of the most important aspects of this type of battle.

Instead of undermining the credibility of the resistance and inciting the Lebanese people to it, Netanyahu’s image and credibility were undermined. It can be said that any subsequent allegations of this kind will from now on be subject to suspicion and neglect among large sectors of public opinion in Lebanon and the enemy’s entity as well.

Hezbollah dealt a severe blow to “Israel” intelligence, which was supposed to have provided Netanyahu with false and misleading information. It seems that the latter and its security and political staff were based on the assumption that Hezbollah would either not invite the media to this place, as is its policy of fortifying the resistance by security, or it will do so at a later time. Then Netanyahu and his apparatus, as happened previously, could claim that Hezbollah emptied the place of missiles.

Hezbollah has provided tangible evidence to the public opinion that the goal of “Israel” is nothing but incitement to resistance, which was what Netanyahu uttered during the speech (calling on the people of the wing to rise up), based on a huge amount of lies and disinformation operations. Which dictates that this station remains engraved in the memory of the public opinion as a witness and an indication of what will come next in terms of allegations and allegations.

* News