Democrats warn of 'lawless' president in impeachment arguments

Democrats warn of 'lawless' president in impeachment arguments
Democrats warn of 'lawless' president in impeachment arguments

Hello and welcome to the details of Democrats warn of 'lawless' president in impeachment arguments and now with the details

Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - US House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff addresses a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington December 3, 2019. —Reuters pic

WASHINGTON, Jan 31 — Democrats warned yesterday that acquitting President Donald of abuse-of-power charges in his impeachment trial would amount to the "normalisation of lawlessness."

In what could be their last bid to make the case for removing the US leader from office, the House impeachment prosecutors expressed outrage over Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz's assertion that a president can do almost anything he wants that he claims is in the public interest.

Adam Schiff, the leader of the House impeachment managers, said the claim turned US law on its head and echoed the Watergate case of disgraced president Richard Nixon 45 years ago.

“What we have seen in the last couple of days is a descent into constitutional madness,” Schiff told the Senate trial.

“Almost half a century ago, we had a president who said, well, when the president does it that means it is not illegal.

“Have we learned nothing in the last half century?”

'Frankly a disgrace'

Schiff spoke during the second day of questions submitted to the prosecution and defence from the 100 senators sitting as the jury.

Trump, only the third president in US history to be impeached and stand trial, is fighting charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his scheme to pressure Ukraine last year to open an investigation into possible 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Trump is alleged to have frozen US$391 million (RM1.59 billion) in defence aid to force Kiev to announce probes into Biden and the Democrats. Democrats say this is an illicit invitation of a foreign government to interfere in a US election.

Trump has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, calling the entire process a politically driven “witch hunt.”

Speaking in Michigan yesterday, Trump labelled the impeachment trial “frankly, a disgrace to our country.”

Dangerous argument

Trump's defence team has argued alternatively that the impeachment is politically driven, that Trump did not tie Ukraine aid to the investigations he sought, that he had reason to seek a probe into his political rival, and that he had the legal right to do so as president.

On Wednesday Dershowitz, a famous criminal defence lawyer and former Harvard University professor, declared that Trump could make those demands if he thought his reelection was “in the public interest.”

“If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment,” he said.

Democrats and much of the US legal community were stunned by the claim.

“I can't think of anything more dangerous to our democracy,” said Neal Katyal, a former top Justice Department official and a law professor at Georgetown University.

“Every president can say, 'heck, I'm doing this in the nation's interest.'”

“It seems like we're back to where we were. The president says it, it's not illegal,” said Schiff.

“That is the normalisation of lawlessness. I would hope that every American would recognise that it's wrong to seek foreign help in an American election.”

Voters should decide

Yesterday, Trump's defence team avoided the issue and repeatedly argued that it was improper to be seeking a popular president's removal by trial in an election year.

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone said Democrats were using impeachment “as a political weapon” and that voters, and not the Senate, should decide Trump's fate in the November election.

“Let's leave it to the people of the United States.... That's who should decide who the president of this country should be. It will be a few months from now, and they should decide,” he said.

Eric Herschmann, another of Trump's lawyer, appeared to argue that Trump's popularity and policy success invalidated any attempt to convict him at trial.

“The president's approval rating while we are sitting here in the middle of these impeachment proceedings has hit an all-time high,” Herschmann said.

“We, the American people, are happier,” he said. “We trust the American people to decide who should be our president.”

Uphill fight

Democrats admitted they were fighting an uphill battle to convince Republicans to go against Trump.

After yesterday's question session, they will have a few hours Friday to push for Senate subpoenas of direct witnesses to Trump's alleged wrongdoing.

First on their list is former White House national security advisor John Bolton, who reportedly claims in a yet-to-be-published book that Trump told him personally that military aid to Ukraine was tied to Kiev's investigating Biden.

But Democrats need to get a majority of the Senate to support a witness call, and Republicans control 53 seats, while the Democrats have 47.

Both sides were pressuring a handful of Republican senators on the issue, but by yesterday it was not clear that Democrats had secured the four crossovers they need in order to call witnesses.

If Democrats fail on the witnesses, Republicans are expected to bring the trial to final votes on the two impeachment charges.

With conviction and removal of the president requiring a two-thirds majority, Trump's acquittal is virtually assured. — AFP

These were the details of the news Democrats warn of 'lawless' president in impeachment arguments for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

NEXT Hamas in Gaza 'strikes deal to reduce violence'