UN risks 'humanitarian catastrophe' with cross-border aid decision

UN risks 'humanitarian catastrophe' with cross-border aid decision
UN risks 'humanitarian catastrophe' with cross-border aid decision

Thank you for your reading and interest in the news UN risks 'humanitarian catastrophe' with cross-border aid decision and now with details

Hind Al Soulia - Riyadh - The UN Security Council on Friday voted to renew a cross-border aid operation into Syria, though reducing the number of crossings to two border points from Turkey into the rebel-held northwest, and shortening the length of authorisation to six months.

The authorisation is technically required in order for UN personnel to deliver aid to Syria via border crossings from neighbouring countries. Authorisation had previously been granted annually.

But the latest round of authorisation in December saw Russia and China veto the mandate for two of the four crossings – one from Jordan into eastern Syrian and one from Iraq into the north-east. Only the two crossings from Turkey into north-western Idlib province will remain open.

Syria's north-west and north-east are in the midst of humanitarian crises caused by mass displacement from years of fighting. It is unclear whether the UN mandate might be extended once again after the six-month authorisation period.

“Syrians will suffer needlessly as a result of this resolution,” Kelly Craft, US ambassador to the UN, told reporters after Friday night’s vote. “Syrians will die as a result of this resolution.”

With the reduced mandate for cross-border aid, the UN Security Council is "utterly failing the people in Syria," Amnesty International wrote in a scathing statement.

The UN vote comes in the midst of an already devastating humanitarian crisis in northern Syria.

More than 1,000 people, including women and children, have already been killed since Syrian forces launched a bombing campaign in Idlib in late April, with the backing of Russian air power. The air strikes and artillery fire have largely honed in on civilian targets. Hospitals, crowded local markets and even school buildings have all come under intense fire. Dozens of medical facilities have been bombed out of service, some rendered piles of rubble, according to the Syrian American Medical Society.

About 300,000 people, many of them from Idlib's southernmost countryside near the frontline between government and rebel forces, have been displaced by the latest round of bombing, according to the UN.

They now live in rented homes, makeshift displacement camps with few services or simply shelter outside in the cold, with blankets or waterproof canvas protecting them from frigid rain.

Idlib province is the last major pocket of rebel-controlled territory after years of military advances by pro-government forces. In past years, areas retaken by the government saw surrender and evacuation deals, with hundreds of thousands of residents choosing to be transported to Idlib rather than stay behind in what would become government-held territory.

Today some three million people live in Idlib, crammed into poorly served camps and scattered across the bombed-out countryside. Many of them are displaced people from Aleppo, the Damascus suburbs and elsewhere. They depend on cross-border aid operations coming in from Turkey for medical care and other basic support.

UN assistance, now in question following last week's vote, only constitutes "a minority of the aid going into Syria, with most humanitarian needs taken care of by NGOs, government-backed NGOs like the Turkish Red Crescent, and by private traders," according to Aron Lund, a fellow with The Century Foundation. "Many of these non-UN actors, including large western NGOs, would probably be reluctant to continue operating cross border without UN cover – especially in an area like Idlib."

But for Syrians in Idlib already suffering poor living conditions there, there is little sense that Friday's vote would have any immediate impact.

The director of one informal camp the Turkish border in northern Idlib told The National by phone that the UN vote would make no difference to the more than 200 families living under his care.

"Not a single aid package has reached our camp in the past six months," Hussein Al Hamadi said. "Not a single basket."

He shared photos of winter flooding in the camp, tents submerged in mud due to the rain.

"If things continue as they are, it's a humanitarian catastrophe."

Updated: January 12, 2020 10:46 PM

These were the details of the news UN risks 'humanitarian catastrophe' with cross-border aid decision for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at The National and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

PREV Oman defends graduate pay cut as means to spur employment
NEXT Hamas in Gaza 'strikes deal to reduce violence'